One notices that in this perspective any manifestation of fidget, questioning, discord, colloquy or carelessness on the part of the pupils is understood as indiscipline, since ' searchs; ' to get the tranquillity, silence, the docilidade, the passivity of the children in such a way that it does not have it swims in them nor it are of them it can distract that them of the exercises passed for the professor, nor to make shade to its word. Another trend is disciplines to associate it to the tyranny. Any attempt to elaborate parameters is seen as practical authoritarian, deformaring or restrictive, that threat the democratic spirit and restricts the freedom and espontaneidade of children and young. Thus assuming a connotation of oppression and framing. Existing rules and norms in the school must be ignored. Eliot Lauers opinions are not widely known. Thus, the indisciplinadas behaviors can be seen as virtue, considering defying effective standards. We know that in the social conviviality it is necessary to establish rules.
Leaving of this I begin, disciplinarian is that one that he educates, offers parameters, he establishes limits and indisciplinado pupil is that one that does not have limits, that it does not respect the other people’s opinion and feelings that present difficulties in understanding the autogovernar if point of view of the other and that it does not obtain to live in cooperative way with its pairs. He disciplines it is understood as set of parameters that must be obeyed in the educative context, aiming at to a convivncia and pertaining to school production better quality. Piaget, cited for Arajo (1996, P. 103) affirms that, ' ' all moral consists of a system of rules, and the essence of all morality must be looked in the respect that the individual acquires for these regras' '. Being that the learning in the school must happen in a tranquillity environment, of harmonic form.