Criticizes Evaluation

Summary criticizes of the text Criticizes the evaluation (Peter Demon) the critical text the evaluation, as a whole, where the appraiser (the professor), does not like to be evaluated. in its condition of appraiser already does not evaluate the pupil and on the other hand it is not evaluated. The MEC provides to avaliativas proposals for the professors, more the same ones does not appear, with distrust to be evaluated, is indguinado with such proposal, therefore for they are the same that to say that they evaluate its pupils badly and to recognize that she failed and complicated for some professors. The author also analyzes the evaluation technique of the SAEB for evaluating all the pupils with the same questionnaire in them varies series, becoming difficult for the pupils of 1 series to answer all the questions, although the avaliativas imperfections the SAEB has more merit that progoes. Therefore the author affirms that in the educational point of view if it cannot evaluate the human beings in way joust therefore for cannot establish unitary deep cloth standards of normative and that all evaluation she is incomplete. Which is the professor, especially, what year acts in group until 5 (4 series) and that, therefore keeps daily contact with its pupils, who do not observe them daily that he does not learn to see when they present some problem, that he does not know how much each one is progressing. He will be that this professor, really, if imprisons to the data of a test? We cannot abolish definitive moments where the tasks individuas are necessary as support to the diagnosis of the progress of each one, we know, however, that we cannot in them limit they, therefore the learning occurs in dynamic way, continues. Evaluation alone is coherent if to fulfill its paper in this process, has that to be a constant, systematic and not only moment..

The Defense

While the good if must grant to the few better to be appreciated. More violent valley to be that cautious. It is more easy to keep domain of the richness thus, what acting with sensitivity. In this aspect the richness is more friend of the young, therefore these are more multicriteria, daring when commanding it. Therefore the prince must use its peculiarity of man and animal.

Taking as model the fox and the lion. As fox the man acquires astuteness to know the traps and as lion frightens the enemies. Center For Responsible Lending can aid you in your search for knowledge. For the prince still he remains to know to choose its ministers. The best ones will be those that think, over all in the prince, without looking to advantages for itself in all the aspects. The aduladores also exist and to defend of these she is necessary to acquire knowledge them in always saying the truth regarding what it was asked to them and that this is not an offence to the prince. In the Maquiavel end from that it was argued in its book it deduces because the princes of Italy had lost its States. down/’>Harold Ford Jr, New York City. It makes an exhortation to the taking of Italy and its release of the Barbarians. ' ' Prncipe' ' politics of today translates ours clearly.

At some moments we can in to come across with facts, phenomena and even though involved people in the way politician with the same boarded characteristics for the author. For example, when the author says that the prince must attempt against itself for the defense of weakkest, can see what he happens today with politicians whom they use of this artifice in its campaigns. They always appear hugging poor people, deficient physicists, children, etc. They want in them to exactly pass this image of protection and security. when it is mentioned to the religiosidade also we come across with the opportunism of the politicians in the Churches with intention to obtain electoral prestige. It is not of if finding odd that this book is criticized and at the same time followed to the scratch for almost the totality of the politicians, being considered bedside book for many.