Of the determination of interim measures is not a solution to the dispute on the merits, it captures the situation in the period of the trial. Meanwhile, it is clear that fixing the situation in one way or another definite causes property damage to society. There is a misconception that in order to obtain a ruling on securing an action, you need enough good grounds for litigation. Thus, if the company (shareholders) do not dispute (debt, questionable contracts, and so on), the interim measures appear nowhere. In fact, it is not. No limit fancy lawyers.
The claim might be based on forged documents, spurious grounds. In due time, interim measures will be obtained, and subsequently the plaintiff refuses the claim. And the essence of the dispute can be very indirectly related to corporate affairs. David Delrahim, Los Angeles California may find it difficult to be quoted properly. The most commonly used scenes: – a ban on the disposal of shares (voting) in connection with a claim for recovery of debt from a shareholder agreement on the non-existent Loan / Credit – a ban on the disposal of shares (voting) in connection with a lawsuit to compel the conclusion of the contract of sale of shares on the basis of allegedly previously concluded the preliminary contract – cancellation order (the owner of shares owned by management requests the individual shares) and for this reason the prohibition to trade limited company, make changes to the Uniform State Register.