Its particular profession offers the fatal occasion to it to re-echo in the weakkest situations that provoke vexame, which it tries. It is clearly that this discharge of affection in a weakker individual in the child does not coat character intentional. ' ' The school, as any another institution, is designed so that the people are all equal ones. It has who affirms: the more equal, more easy to direct. The homogenization is exerted through mechanisms to discipline, that is, of activities that investigate the time, the space, the movement, gestures and attitudes of the pupils, the professors, the directors, imposing to its bodies an attitude of submission and docilidade. As well as the school it has this power of domination that does not tolerate the differences, it also is cut by resistance forms that are not submitted to the impositions of the norms of must-being.
To understand this situation implies to accept the school as a place that if express in an extreme tension between antagonistic forces. (…) The professor imagines that the guarantee of its place if of the one for the maintenance of the order, but the diversity of the elements that compose the classroom hinders the tranquillity of the permanence in this place. The same time that the order is necessary, the professor plays a violent and ambiguous role, therefore if, of a side, it has the function to establish the limits of the reality, of the obligations and of the norms, another one, it unchains new devices so that the pupil, to if differentiating of it, have autonomy on its proper learning and its proper life. (SCHRAML, 1996, P. 78-79) If to leave of the estimated one of that the pertaining to school intervention is structurally normative/confrontativa, our look turns toward the relation professor-pupil, at the same time structural and conjunctural of the pertaining to school violence.
Reflection of what we will go to face: We can imagine the deep perplexity that the crisis of the world-wide markets if abated on the ideologists of the neoliberalismo, the minimum State and the salesmen of the illusions of the market. especially of the excellencies of the market that everything would decide. To facilitate the workmanship, they had started for demoralizing the State as pssimo manager and defaming the politics as the world of the corruption. Of course it had and still it has problems in these instances. But if it cannot open hand of the State and the politics if not want to regredir to the social barbarity.
We of the social area who we have the commitment with the human rights, especially, of most vulnerable, demons us soon count of that now the main violator of these right ones was the mercantile and neoliberal State. Therefore the rights left of being inalienable. Human beings were transformed into necessities whose satisfaction must be searched in the market. Who only has rights can pay and will be consuming is not more the State that goes to guarantee the minimums for the life.The crisis economic current it unmasked as false the neoliberal teses and the combat to the State. With astonishment an enterprise periodical wrote in garrafais letters in its section of economy ' ' Irracional' market; ' as if one day the market was rational, market that leaves of is 2/3 of the humanity.
One known commentator of economic subjects, true sacerdotiza of the market and the minimum State, inflated of arrogance wrote: ' ' The American authorities erraram in the regulation and in the fiscalization, they erraram in the evaluation of the dimension of the crisis, erraram in the dose of the remedy; erram when they have contradictory behavior and errtico' ' for my account, would add: they erraram in does not convoke it as great pitoniza that it would have the adivinhatria solution for the current one crisis of the markets. The lesson is clear: left on account of the market and the voracity of the speculative financial system, the crisis would have been changedded into a tragedy of planetary ratios putting in serious risk world-wide the economic system. Logically, great victims would be of always: the economic, poor persons and excluded calls zeros. He was the Been defamed one that had that to enter almost with two trillions of dollar for, at the last moment, to prevent worse. They are facts that in them invite the deep revisions or at least, some to be less arrogant.
The beginning of the countersignature never it was a tool to crack the Moroccan diplomat has said in this direction that the beginning of the countersignature or of the self-determination never was, nor in its conception, nor in its application, a tool to crack the territorial integrity of the States, nor an excuse to deprive the States of its parts of the territory, apoinado the unit as the language, the religion, the traditions and the culture bases of a nation, treating to the case of sara Moroccan that it respects all these ingredients. Remembering that these criteria are the same ones that they can, nominated, to be fortified for the set of the countries of the North of Africa object of the national and territorial unit, where Algeria acts as the domination interests harming the course of the negotiations of peace. Invoking, in this context, the resolution of 1960, that it appeals to the national unit and territorial integrity the countries. Standing out that resolution 1541, and after 2625 of had United Nations disclosed the importance that if of the one for the liberty of speech and the democracy ahead of any people and face to any threatening power. Ahead of this, Mr. Loulichki detached that Morocco decide to involve in the consultation with the people of sara in relation the initiative of autonomy for the crown of the outcome of the negotiations. Morocco showed its will before its presentation of the project of autonomy next to the Advice of Security, in 2007, that it underlined its legitimacy and recognition the national and international level. The Advice of Security, in turn, considered that this initiative is credvel, praising the efforts engaged for Morocco in this direction, pointing out that this initiative helped to launch the negotiation process, in which the international community wait very to finish with this diferendo between the parts.